Litecoin vs Bitcoin

Bitcoin arrived in 2009 with a bold promise: to cut out the middleman entirely. Satoshi Nakamoto didn't just want to build another payment system — they wanted to fundamentally change how money works. It was about trustless value transfer, transparency, and control over one’s own assets.

Two years later, in 2011, Charlie Lee — an ex-Google engineer — launched Litecoin (LTC). It wasn’t meant to replace Bitcoin. In Lee’s own words, "Litecoin is the silver to Bitcoin’s gold." Instead, it was built to complement it: faster block times, lower fees, and a new hashing algorithm that, at the time, resisted industrial-scale mining.

Fast-forward to 2025, and the BTC vs LTC debate is still going strong — just with much more data to compare.

Origin and Philosophy

• Bitcoin: Born out of the 2008 financial crisis, Bitcoin emerged with a mission to remove third-party intermediaries and give users full custody of their funds. The whitepaper didn’t promise speed or low fees — it promised freedom.
• Litecoin: Litecoin was a fork of Bitcoin Core 0.8.5 but tweaked key parameters to favor usability: 2.5-minute block times (vs. Bitcoin's 10), a total supply four times larger, and Scrypt instead of SHA-256 to deter ASICs (though that didn't last — ASICs for Scrypt arrived by 2014).

📌 Did You Know? Litecoin was the first network to successfully activate SegWit — a major Bitcoin upgrade — before Bitcoin itself in 2017.

Hashing Algorithm & Mining

Bitcoin uses the SHA-256 algorithm, which is now dominated by industrial-scale ASIC mining farms. This has centralized hashing power, raising concerns even from within the Bitcoin community. As of May 2024, Bitcoin’s hashrate topped 730.50 EH/s (exahashes per second), according to data from Statista.

Litecoin uses the Scrypt hashing algorithm, originally intended to make mining more accessible. While initially ASIC-resistant, it too eventually fell to ASIC dominance. Litecoin’s network hashrate hovered around 2.45 PH/s (petahash) in June 2025 — over 581,000 times smaller than Bitcoin’s, illustrating the vast difference in network scale and security budget.

Transaction Speed & Throughput

Let’s talk throughput — a critical metric for daily usability:

• Bitcoin confirms a block approximately every 10 minutes and processes about 7 transactions per second (TPS). (Source)
• Litecoin is much faster with a block every 2.5 minutes and theoretical capacity of 56 TPS. (Source)

In real-world conditions, Litecoin often confirms payments in under 5 minutes, while Bitcoin transactions may sit unconfirmed during high network congestion — unless a higher fee is paid.

Halving Schedules & Supply Mechanics

Here's where both networks get clever about scarcity:

• Bitcoin halves miner rewards in half every 210,000 blocks — we just saw this happen in April 2024, bringing rewards down to 3.125 BTC.
• Litecoin halves does the same thing every 840,000 blocks, with the next cut coming July 30, 2027.

But here's the kicker: Bitcoin will only ever have 21 million coins, while Litecoin caps at 84 million. That tighter supply gives Bitcoin more psychological punch when markets get excited.

Real-World Use Cases

Bitcoin

• Store of Value: The "digital gold" narrative has clearly resonated with institutional money. Fidelity found that 40% of institutional crypto portfolios now hold Bitcoin — that's serious validation.
• ETFs & Regulation: The recent approval of Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. and Europe has opened the floodgates for traditional investors who wanted exposure without the hassle of self-custody.
• Lightning Network: For speed demons, there's the Lightning Network, which can handle instant micropayments. The catch? It's still mostly a playground for crypto nerds.

Litecoin

• Everyday Payments: With lower fees and faster confirmation, Litecoin excels in microtransactions. Merchants like Travala, RE/MAX, and even some Subway franchises now accept LTC.
• Testing Ground: Bitcoin upgrades like SegWit and Taproot were tested on Litecoin first, making it a proving ground for Bitcoin development.

Retail Adoption: According to BitPay, LTC was the third most-used crypto for merchant payments in 2024, behind BTC and USDT.

Pros and Cons Overview

‍

Which Should You Use?

This comes down to intent:

• Need a long-term store of value? Bitcoin is still the gold standard.
• Want to send $10 to a friend for coffee, fast and cheap? Litecoin is your coin.

Bitcoin thrives on institutional capital, scarcity narratives, and growing support from financial markets. Litecoin, meanwhile, continues quietly chipping away at the payments niche — even if its brand isn’t quite as flashy.

If you’re just getting into crypto and want a low-cost way to experiment with transfers, wallets, and real usage, consider starting with LTC. You can get Litecoin instantly via Atomic Wallet and experience how crypto payments actually work.

Where to Buy Bitcoin and Litecoin

Both assets are widely available:

• Centralized exchanges like Binance and Coinbase offer BTC and LTC.
• Non-custodial wallets such as Atomic Wallet allow direct purchases. For fast access, try the best place to buy crypto with a card.

Litecoin vs Bitcoin in 2025

Bitcoin and Litecoin share common DNA but serve different roles. Bitcoin is the store of value — a digital reserve asset growing into the mainstream. Litecoin is the nimble workhorse, optimized for speed, cost, and simplicity.

As Charlie Lee said in 2011: "Litecoin complements Bitcoin. It’s meant to fill a different need — and that’s still true today."

For users, it’s not a matter of “BTC vs LTC” — it’s about the right tool for the right job.

But when it comes to litecoin transaction time, network speed, and everyday usability, Litecoin quietly outperforms. It’s fast, it’s cheap, and it works — especially if you're wondering how to pay with litecoin in real life. 

Litecoin keeps quietly winning the payments game. More merchants accept it through BitPay, and it's become the go-to choice for small, quick transactions. The bottom line? Bitcoin attracts the big money, but Litecoin handles the day-to-day stuff. There's room for both — crypto doesn't need a single winner.