Teardrop Attack Explained: Understanding Packet Fragmentation and Its Effects

Cyber threats are evolving fast — from headline-grabbing hacks like MOVEit and Log4Shell to stealthy exploits hiding in plain sight. But not all danger comes from cutting-edge code. Some of the most damaging attacks still rely on old-school tactics. One of them? The Teardrop Attack.

Let's break down how it works, what role packet fragmentation plays, and why this decades-old method still matters today.

What is a Teardrop Attack?

A Teardrop Attack is a form of Denial-of-Service (DoS) where the attacker takes advantage of the way computers reassemble broken network packets. In general terms, whenever data traverses a network and is larger than one packet, it is fragmented into pieces or fragments and numbered using sequence numbers or offsets. The receiving system reconstructs the whole message perfectly using offsets.

But in a Teardrop Attack, the offender specifically creates spurious or overlapping offset values within the fragmented packets. This renders the receiving system incapable of correct reassembling and causes crashes, system reboots, or instability.

According to Imperva's recent 2025 overview, Teardrop Attacks originally targeted older systems like Windows 95, Windows NT, and early Linux versions. While most modern systems are now patched against basic forms of this attack, many unpatched or misconfigured devices remain vulnerable — keeping the door open for exploitation.

To understand how this attack still works, we first need to look at packet fragmentation — the key mechanism Teardrop exploits.

Teardrop Attacks Compared to Other Legacy Attacks

While Teardrop Attacks exploit the vulnerability in packet fragmentation, other attacks like the Ping of Death or Land Attack also rely on similar weaknesses within network protocols. The Ping of Death floods a system with an oversized ICMP packet, causing it to crash, while the Land Attack sends a malicious packet with the same source and destination address, tricking the target into an endless loop.

Like the Ping of Death, Teardrop exploits malformed packets, but it specifically targets the way packets are reassembled, making it more subtle. The Land Attack, in comparison, is a direct attack on a system's ability to handle incoming connections, often leading to immediate system failure.

Each of these attacks demonstrates how simple design flaws in network communication can lead to devastating disruptions, especially in legacy systems still in use today.

Packet Fragmentation in the Context of a Teardrop Attack

We cannot start to describe the vulnerability until we describe packet fragmentation and how it becomes a factor in a teardrop attack.

Different protocols handle fragmentation in distinct ways:

• IP (Internet Protocol): Handles fragmentation at the network layer. IPv4 routers can fragment packets, while IPv6 requires the sender to do it.
• TCP (Transmission Control Protocol): Avoids fragmentation by using MSS (Maximum Segment Size) negotiation; it splits data into segments below the MTU.
• UDP (User Datagram Protocol): Relies on IP for fragmentation. If a fragment is lost, the whole datagram is discarded—no retransmission.
• ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol): Uses IP-level fragmentation; vulnerable if packets are crafted to exploit reassembly logic.

As Twingate notes, fragmentation is essential, but vulnerabilities arise when attackers exploit how protocols reassemble fragments.

What Are the Effects of a Packet Fragmentation (Teardrop) Attack?

When we ask what are the effects of a packet fragmentation (teardrop) attack, the effects are extreme:

• Denial of Service (DoS): The impacted systems usually freeze, crash, or reboot, resulting in service downtime.
• Resource Exhaustion: Re-processing of malformed packets over and over will occupy CPUs and memory, resulting in performance degradation but not immediate crash.
• Increased Attack Surface: Systems crashing repeatedly may expose vulnerabilities or misconfigurations which can be further exploited by attackers.
• Disruption of Critical Services: With industries like cryptocurrency, whose availability is paramount, even a brief disruption can cause huge financial loss and lost customer trust.

Real-world attacks show that outdated Linux systems used in crypto nodes remain vulnerable. For example, CVE-2018-5391 (FragmentSmack) affected systems often found in crypto infrastructure, highlighting the ongoing risk. While larger operating systems have patched teardrop vulnerabilities, some threats persist due to operational realities:

• Legacy Systems: Many in DeFi and crypto mining still rely on outdated hardware.
• IoT Devices: The rise of IoT exposes more vulnerable points.
• Hybrid Attacks: Cybercriminals combine old techniques like teardrop with newer methods to evade detection.

Packet fragmentation attacks, like Teardrop variants, remain top network layer threats.

In December 2024, Dogecoin's "Dogereaper" attack exploited an unpatched flaw, crashing 69% of active nodes, highlighting risks in outdated crypto systems.

How to Protect Your Server From a Teardrop Attack

Defense is a job of multiple layers of protection and alertness. These are the countermeasures we have in place to guard against teardrop attack vulnerabilities:

• Use Regular System Updates: Operating systems, drivers, and network firmware must be kept current. This is the first line of defense.
• Use Advanced Firewalls: Advanced firewalls can scan damaged packets and discard malformed traffic before it reaches the system.
• Implement Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS): IDPS are capable of detecting unusual fragmentation patterns and alerting administrators.
• Patch and Harden Legacy Systems: Legacy systems need to be utilized wherever possible, and every patch must be installed and limit their access to the public internet.
• Monitor Network Traffic: Active monitoring will capture malicious packet fragmentation patterns before they are deployed as full-scale attacks.

Cybersecurity experts all agree that while Teardrop Attacks are not as common as other more modern attacks like ransomware or sophisticated phishing, they still pose a risk for organizations that are not prepared.

Quick Checklist to Assess Vulnerability:

• Is the system fully updated (OS, drivers, firmware)?
• Are advanced firewall rules in place for malformed packet filtering?
• Is an IDPS solution actively monitoring fragmentation patterns?
• Are legacy systems patched and restricted from external access?
• Is network traffic logging and anomaly detection enabled?

Still Fragile Beneath the Surface

The Teardrop Attack reminds us that even outdated exploits can return with real consequences when systems are left exposed. In fast-moving fields like crypto, where uptime is money and trust is everything, overlooking old threats is a costly mistake.

Modern security starts with mastering the basics — and ignoring them makes you a target.

Now's the time — update, monitor, and harden your infrastructure before someone else finds the crack first.

‍