Trust Wallet vs Atomic: Comparing Pros, Cons and Features for Every Crypto Holder

Security and ease of storing cryptocurrency is the foundation of cryptocurrency investment. The new crypto investor demands more than just a storage space for assets. Wallets need to provide security, multi-chain capabilities, ease, and most importantly, make users masters of their money.

Two of the most highly recommended wallets in existence today are Atomic Wallet and Trust Wallet. Both are self-custody wallets, meaning that users get to keep their private keys. But in spite of having this important element, they also differ in several important aspects. In this article, we will be comparing both wallets against each other based on their features, pros, and cons so you can make an informed decision in the ongoing debate of atomic vs trust wallet.

Feature Comparison

Type: Desktop vs Mobile — Atomic vs Trust Wallet Flexibility

Atomic Wallet is cross-platform, in the sense that users have access to their funds and capacity to manage assets on desktop as well as on mobile. This provides a fantastic feature for people who prefer to use a bigger screen for more precise control or people who prefer the convenience of having a smartphone.

Alternatively, Trust Wallet is phone-only. The nature of such an application renders it very much ideal for clients who appreciate the convenience and portability that comes with having crypto stored in their phone. Phone-only access will not, however, be appropriate for users who prefer to hold and manage crypto on bigger screens, i.e., desktop users.

This highlights a core debate in the atomic vs trustwallet conversation—do you need desktop flexibility, or is mobile-only access enough?

Custody: Absolute Control Over Assets — Trust Wallet vs Atomic on User Possession

Both Atomic Wallet and Trust Wallet are non-custodial wallets, and their users own their private keys. This is a prerequisite in decentralized finance because users want to be free from centralized intermediaries. Both wallets have the same philosophy of possession and access—users own their own keys, their own money.

Supported Assets: Coin Coverage in Atomic vs Trustwallet Ecosystem

Trust Wallet has more than 70 blockchain support, and this enables the users to receive an array of tokens from less popular projects and decentralized applications (dApps) in broad ranges. It is thus ideal for users with a long history of the multi-chain environment or even for people who enjoy experimenting with new tokens.

On the other hand, Atomic Wallet supports over 1,000 assets, some of which are the more popular coins such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Litecoin (LTC). It is the number of assets in itself that makes it a good option for those who like to remain with the known cryptocurrencies but still have an opportunity to diversify their assets into less popular coins.

This asset diversity is often at the heart of the trust wallet vs atomic feature breakdown.

Staking Features: Atomic vs Trust Wallet Staking Options

Staking is one of the largest requirements for most crypto owners today who want to gain passive income. Both Trust Wallet and Atomic Wallet support staking but in different ways. Trust Wallet officially supports staking coins like Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), and Polkadot (DOT), while Atomic Wallet supports staking coins like Cardano (ADA), Tezos (XTZ), and Cosmos (ATOM). While the supported assets vary, both wallets give customers a platform on which to receive staking rewards through simple-to-use interfaces to make it happen.

So if staking variety matters to you, comparing atomic vs trust wallet becomes even more essential.

Token Swaps: Atomic vs Trust Wallet Swap Tools Compared

Trust Wallet provides token swap capability in the form of decentralized exchange (DEX) integrations such as PancakeSwap and Uniswap. Although the integrations facilitate swapping an extremely high number of tokens, liquidity at times can be low, and the user interface can be extremely difficult to use for new users of decentralized exchanges.

Atomic Wallet simplifies the swapping by offering cross-chain swaps inside the wallet. The highlight? Atomic Wallet does not require KYC (Know Your Customer) verification for most of its pairs. That is, it is quicker and simpler for individuals who would rather swap tokens without having to undergo an identification verification process.

Hardware Wallet Support: Trust Wallet Pros and Atomic Cons in Security Extensions

Through April 2025, Atomic Wallet and Trust Wallet both do not support hardware wallets. Both of these wallets do provide security in some form, however. Atomic Wallet uses AES encryption and local key storage, and Trust Wallet is secured by secure mobile operating system environments. Without hardware wallet support, users may still be able to depend on these internal measures to secure their funds.

In this regard, trust wallet pros and atomic wallet cons become a matter of how each handles encryption and user autonomy.

In-App Purchase Crypto: Atomic vs Trustwallet Fiat Support Comparison

Trust Wallet employs third-party intermediaries to purchase fiat, therefore, users in the majority of cases will have to go through KYC verification when they use the app to purchase crypto. It may not be suitable for users who do not want to go through the process of identity verification.

Atomic Wallet, however, has fiat-to-crypto exchange within the app with a feature to buy crypto with credit card, Apple Pay, or bank transfer. This is much quicker with less step-by-step and without KYC on most of the options. For instance, you can buy Solana with a credit card in a couple of clicks—fast, safe, and never leaving the app.

Customer Support: Trust Wallet Cons vs Atomic's Live Help Advantage

Customer support-wise, Trust Wallet does offer email support, but the response is sometimes slow, and this may not be ideal for customers with urgent problems or transactional problems.

Atomic Wallet offers 24/7 customer support with human support agents available 24/7 to clarify confusion and solve problems. The 24/7 support provides users with instant and reliable support when they need it the most. If timely help is a priority, this is where trust wallet cons may come into focus.

Privacy Comparison: Atomic vs Trust Wallet Data Practices

Trust Wallet does have anonymity to the extent that it doesn't do KYC, but the users should be aware that the app does come with telemetry on by default. Although the telemetry can technically be disabled, it is something for especially privacy-conscious users to pay attention to.

Atomic Wallet, on the other hand, focuses a great deal on privacy with no telemetry gathered and no KYC. All is locally stored on the device of the user, so transaction information and personal information are safe and private.

Open Source Philosophy: Trust Wallet Pro's in Transparency

Trust Wallet is code open source in its app, and as such it is well suited for developers who need to audit or write for the codebase.

Atomic Wallet has factors of openness wherein it's open-source but fails to detail all of its code. This cuts openness in some way but is more concerned with security and user safety.

Final Verdict: Which Wallet to Use? Trust Wallet vs Atomic Reviewed

Trust Wallet is an excellent choice for mobile-first users who need instant and simple access to various blockchains and decentralized applications (dApps). It is ideally suited for the most active users of the mobile crypto space who need instant access to anything from their phone.

Atomic Wallet, cross-platform, transparent staking, privacy-focused, and fiat-to-crypto buying easy, is a high-feature choice for the individual seeking greater freedom. Both the casual owner of crypto and the regular investor, Atomic Wallet is an end-to-end solution for secure asset management.

Lastly, the ideal wallet for you is merely a question of what you require. If you like mobile convenience and dApps functionality, or if you like a wallet with plenty of features that provides desktop functionality, staking transparency, and privacy, Atomic Wallet and Trust Wallet both have good options for keeping your crypto wealth safe. When you break down trust wallet vs atomic, your personal needs should always lead the way.

Read Also:

• Atomic Wallet $1,000,000 Bug Bounty Program
• Osmosis Slashing Incident Report
• 3 Different Ways of Filing your Crypto Taxes
• Atomic Wallet Roadmap: 2023

‍